World Cup 2014: Ann Coulter Says Soccer Isn’t Violent! Didn’t Luis Suarez Just Bite Someone?

Ann Coulter lambasts everything good about soccer in her hateful piece about the World Cup 2014. The Conservative columnist slams the sport for not being violent, even though Luis Suarez is in trouble for biting, and there are no noteworthy players in the game.

The political commentator believes there should always be a constant threat of personal disgrace in a game. Coulter writes, "In hockey, there are three or four fights a game -- and it's not a stroll on beach to be on ice with a puck flying around at 100 miles per hour. After a football game, ambulances carry off the wounded. After a soccer game, every player gets a ribbon and a juice box."

Just hold on a second there. Isn't Suarez leaving the greatest stage in public shame? As reported here, the Hannibal Lecter of soccer has been banned biting an Italy playing during the match. Being fined is the least of the Uruguay player's problems. The biter is actually going to lose his sponsorship with 888poker.

The American conservative doesn't even recognize that these athletes train hard for this event. The Godless writer ignorantly asks, "Do they even have MVPs in soccer? Everyone just runs up and down the field and, every once in a while, a ball accidentally goes in."

If there were no stars in soccer, I'm sure Victoria's Secret Angel Adriana Lima wouldn't be trying to seduce you into watching the game. I'm betting Playboy's Raquel Pomplun wouldn't be cheering if she didn't know any of the Mexican players.

If soccer isn't "catching on" like Coulter says, then why did Nike spend so much effect into their animated The Last Game short? Why did Beats have a star-studded commercial, The Game Before The Game?

Ann Coulter disses soccer fans and the game itself with her ignorant column piece about the World Cup. Readers, what do you think of Coulter's statements?